<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new Facebook Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:47:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terrell Aguilar</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrell Aguilar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-152</guid>
		<description>bs2r63clmd2qv6ps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bs2r63clmd2qv6ps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Yo Facebook, please fix all the mac bugs. Anyhow, I love you pointing out the simple and consistent palette. What I love is that they provide a simple ui (knock as much of the noise out, which btw, they could continue to do) for all, then allow users to add their own punch where desired (lets say with apps). Some products do the exact opposite, forcing their own overboard aesthetic preferences on you (this is so very bad). The two huge values of aesthetics in UI are 1) reinforcement of brand identity and 2) help in location of an element when it is needed. They are getting better at it letting the content (imgs, apps, text) shine while subtly dropping the ui back a bit. I know the blue is killing you though ;^) Overall, facebook is taking a step in the right direction, and has the opportunity to continue building upon and capitalizing on the long wow. While not the sexyist or most flamboyant, both facebook and linkedin deserve a eye to be kept on them by all ui designers in the future.

On the tech capabilities (no flicker etc.) they could be a little more open, understanding that some folks like using multiple platforms (not to mention that fb&#039;s image galleries are so freaking limited). Please be more courteous to your users preferences and history (years they invested building assets on other platforms). They are just plain greedy here!

BTW - that&#039;s a great looking mini with a kayak on top of it, in your screencaps. Bet he&#039;s a pretty interesting guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Facebook, please fix all the mac bugs. Anyhow, I love you pointing out the simple and consistent palette. What I love is that they provide a simple ui (knock as much of the noise out, which btw, they could continue to do) for all, then allow users to add their own punch where desired (lets say with apps). Some products do the exact opposite, forcing their own overboard aesthetic preferences on you (this is so very bad). The two huge values of aesthetics in UI are 1) reinforcement of brand identity and 2) help in location of an element when it is needed. They are getting better at it letting the content (imgs, apps, text) shine while subtly dropping the ui back a bit. I know the blue is killing you though ;^) Overall, facebook is taking a step in the right direction, and has the opportunity to continue building upon and capitalizing on the long wow. While not the sexyist or most flamboyant, both facebook and linkedin deserve a eye to be kept on them by all ui designers in the future.</p>
<p>On the tech capabilities (no flicker etc.) they could be a little more open, understanding that some folks like using multiple platforms (not to mention that fb&#8217;s image galleries are so freaking limited). Please be more courteous to your users preferences and history (years they invested building assets on other platforms). They are just plain greedy here!</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; that&#8217;s a great looking mini with a kayak on top of it, in your screencaps. Bet he&#8217;s a pretty interesting guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-75</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t like the wall being separate from the user profile… maybe I’m unique in that, but for me the profile next to wall brings the feel of more personal interaction.&quot;

That&#039;s an interesting point. Thanks for bringing it up. 

It will be interesting to see how Facebook and other social apps approach this problem-- focusing on what someone is doing while still maintaining the anchor and familiarity one gets when viewing someone&#039;s personal information, even though they may already know it all already.

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t like the wall being separate from the user profile… maybe I’m unique in that, but for me the profile next to wall brings the feel of more personal interaction.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting point. Thanks for bringing it up. </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how Facebook and other social apps approach this problem&#8211; focusing on what someone is doing while still maintaining the anchor and familiarity one gets when viewing someone&#8217;s personal information, even though they may already know it all already.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christi Wulf</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Christi Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, your first comment (on this post) from a non-programmer/computer person. Please go easy on me : ).

The moment I saw the new facebook I immediately looked for a way to go back to the old one. Maybe it&#039;s fear of the unfamiliar... maybe it was the fact that the browser window didn&#039;t change size an all the sudden I felt like the internet was yelling at me. 

I think you nailed it when you said the new version is &quot;floaty&quot; and still very loud. 

I don&#039;t like the wall being separate from the user profile... maybe I&#039;m unique in that, but for me the profile next to wall brings the feel of more personal interaction. However, I will not miss all the apps/photos/whatever that those friends allowed to go on their wall.

I&#039;m glad I read through your review, it definitely sheds more light on how to use/appreciate the new interface. I think they have some kinks to work out, but after reading your take on it I definitely see some improvements and I MIGHT even give the new facebook a second chance. 

Okay, I have to go pretend like I understand what&#039;s on www.welcome.totheinter.net now so my husband doesn&#039;t get jealous. Although even I can tell that the columizer thing is very cool. Good job Adam : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, your first comment (on this post) from a non-programmer/computer person. Please go easy on me : ).</p>
<p>The moment I saw the new facebook I immediately looked for a way to go back to the old one. Maybe it&#8217;s fear of the unfamiliar&#8230; maybe it was the fact that the browser window didn&#8217;t change size an all the sudden I felt like the internet was yelling at me. </p>
<p>I think you nailed it when you said the new version is &#8220;floaty&#8221; and still very loud. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the wall being separate from the user profile&#8230; maybe I&#8217;m unique in that, but for me the profile next to wall brings the feel of more personal interaction. However, I will not miss all the apps/photos/whatever that those friends allowed to go on their wall.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I read through your review, it definitely sheds more light on how to use/appreciate the new interface. I think they have some kinks to work out, but after reading your take on it I definitely see some improvements and I MIGHT even give the new facebook a second chance. </p>
<p>Okay, I have to go pretend like I understand what&#8217;s on <a href="http://www.welcome.totheinter.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.welcome.totheinter.net</a> now so my husband doesn&#8217;t get jealous. Although even I can tell that the columizer thing is very cool. Good job Adam : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Wulf</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-72</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now it’s super easy to tell how to get information into the app, and I’m quite partial to the ability to take a picture via webcam. The ajax interaction here is superb.&quot;

agreed, that ajax was very slick.

&quot;Editing the size of a status message is kind of a strange option– I think this feature isn’t fully fleshed out– but I do like that drop out animation.&quot;

I would like the drop out animation, but I hate how all the stuff below it jumps around b/c of it. wrap that sucker in an overflow:hidden :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now it’s super easy to tell how to get information into the app, and I’m quite partial to the ability to take a picture via webcam. The ajax interaction here is superb.&#8221;</p>
<p>agreed, that ajax was very slick.</p>
<p>&#8220;Editing the size of a status message is kind of a strange option– I think this feature isn’t fully fleshed out– but I do like that drop out animation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would like the drop out animation, but I hate how all the stuff below it jumps around b/c of it. wrap that sucker in an overflow:hidden <img src='http://www.keepthewebweird.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-71</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cool, the cleanup job is nice. It fixes some of the complaints I had here, for sure. 

However it&#039;s no less noisy (injecting reverse wall functionality right into the Profile wall is a good concept at first, but blurs a few workflow lines that shouldn&#039;t be blurred) and there&#039;s some serious arrowage going on there.

Also I&#039;m not much for constraining the app with the blue background color -- it makes it feel claustrophobic, which is in direct contrast of what they&#039;re trying to accomplish with this redesign.

The biggest change I could make as far as reducing visual noise would be to remove the actions box out of the wall tab, and float it above it instead. It&#039;s building an unnecessary context between your wall and entering data into the app, and it&#039;s visually cluttered. 

In addition, I&#039;d focus the Profile page even more by yanking photos out of the sidebar and putting Friends into its own tab. This frees up that left column and with a bit more love, it could be removed completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cool, the cleanup job is nice. It fixes some of the complaints I had here, for sure. </p>
<p>However it&#8217;s no less noisy (injecting reverse wall functionality right into the Profile wall is a good concept at first, but blurs a few workflow lines that shouldn&#8217;t be blurred) and there&#8217;s some serious arrowage going on there.</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;m not much for constraining the app with the blue background color &#8212; it makes it feel claustrophobic, which is in direct contrast of what they&#8217;re trying to accomplish with this redesign.</p>
<p>The biggest change I could make as far as reducing visual noise would be to remove the actions box out of the wall tab, and float it above it instead. It&#8217;s building an unnecessary context between your wall and entering data into the app, and it&#8217;s visually cluttered. </p>
<p>In addition, I&#8217;d focus the Profile page even more by yanking photos out of the sidebar and putting Friends into its own tab. This frees up that left column and with a bit more love, it could be removed completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriskalani</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>chriskalani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-70</guid>
		<description>My friend Andrew did a little cleanup that I really like and think they should consider: http://flickr.com/photos/smashstatusquo/2692528334/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Andrew did a little cleanup that I really like and think they should consider: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/smashstatusquo/2692528334/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/photos/smashstatusquo/2692528334/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sigler</title>
		<link>http://www.keepthewebweird.com/the-new-facebook-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepthewebweird.com/?p=48#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Really in -depth and fair review, Buck. Thanks for going over it. I honestly had no idea that Facebook was in the process of a redesign. To me, facebook is an app that I would love to use, but find no need for it. Perhaps this will lure me back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really in -depth and fair review, Buck. Thanks for going over it. I honestly had no idea that Facebook was in the process of a redesign. To me, facebook is an app that I would love to use, but find no need for it. Perhaps this will lure me back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.080 seconds -->

<!-- Page not cached by WP Super Cache. Could not get mutex lock. -->
